Links as valuable blog content?

In the past week, not only have I had a birthday (which always gets me thinking about what I am doing), but I have come across several blog entries that have made me think about my “Interesting Finds” entries.  Last week was Andrew Garrett’s entry – No-one links to the linkers and Mike Gunderloy’s entry – (Contest Time Again) about his contest coming up for his 1000th Daily Grind entry and last night was Sam Gentile’s entry – New and Notable 100! The Big 100.

I have to admit that I agree with most of what Andrew says in his entry. 

Mike and Sam are both linkers but they heavily supplement their content with real original content which reinforces a following of people who like the subject matter they specialize in.  I know Sam spends a great deal of time on some of his entries (like his How To: STS/Windows Authentication with ADAM/AD, Roles in AzMan with WCF) and  Mike provides a ton of Book and Product reviews that help all of us developers decide what we should get or at least look further into.  I’ve been reading Mike’s Daily Grind for years and I get the feeling he writes reviews in his sleep.

So back to the subject of links – why do bloggers see them as being important?  Or should I say, why do we see people linking to our stuff as being important?  Is it important when you link to someone else?  How about comments?  Aren’t comments more of a commitment and more meaningful?

Out of the blog [entries] that I read, Mike's and Sam's carry the most weight as to links that I should probably check out.  I also like they way that they give their opinions or review of the links they list (this by the way requires much more time and talent than my simple listing of links that I find interesting).  I will have to admit that I do take their link listings for granted, meaning I rarely take that extra step and let them know that I found their work valuable - something I intend on starting.

Bottom line is, I do think links are valuable content, but I place more weight on a link listing if the [feed] content also contains large amounts of original content as well ... anyways that is my opinion.  What is yours?

posted on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:28 AM

Feedback

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

I've said it before and I'll jump up and down about it again: your blog is terrific because you do all the work so I don't have to. I subscribe to Gunderloy and like his stuff, I subscribe to Gentile and like his sporadically-posted stuff.

Sure, it's nice to have a bit of commentary with the links, but for me G&G's blogs are a horse of a different color than your blog. Your feed is rich with quality links and it's *concise*.

As for folks not linking to the linkers, that's just plain cheesey. Frankly, I think it borders on whatever the blogosphere's equivalent of plagarism is. I always reference a source post. Not referencing the original finder is a bit duplicitous since it makes it look like you're the smart guy who found the original post, when it was someone else's bit of work.

Sorry. Rant off. You may bring small children back in the room now.
6/14/2006 12:20 PM | Jim Holmes

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

Jim: Thanks for your comments and complements!

I suspect one of the problems as to why people don't link to linkers really is because of the chatter. If 100 people are talking about Scoble leaving (for example) it becomes hard to credit every link that you found along the way.
6/14/2006 12:32 PM | Jason Haley

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

I definitely agree that links are extremely valuable. Especially for those of us using RSS. I look at your feed daily and tag a lot of your links for later reading using Del.cio.us.

And I agree with the chatter aspect of linking across blogs. The only real way around the chatter aspect is through trackbacks (which rarely result in hits from what I've noticed).
6/14/2006 1:04 PM | Karthik

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

To add to what Jim said, I also like the fact that you categorize links. That's added value.

There's another blog that just dumps the links in a huge list and my eyes glaze over.

Also, even though I subscribe to many of the same blogs, sometimes I will read an article I skipped over because it appears in your list.

Phil
6/14/2006 1:15 PM | Haacked

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

I think all you have to do is look at your subscriber counts to determine the value of your links, Godfather. And as others have mentioned, commentary is nice, but your links are comprehensive and efficient. Don't feel you need to change anything just because your Interesting Finds is different. I for one think you don't have to change a thing! Well, you may want to upgrade to Community Server from .Text, but other than that... :-)
6/14/2006 2:21 PM | Dave Burke

# New and Notable 101

Not much today.
WCF/SOA/WSE

The WCF RSS Toolkit is a Windows Communication Foundation-based framework...
6/14/2006 3:06 PM | Sam Gentile

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

Guys: Thanks for all the comments.

Dave: I may upgrade to CS 2.0 soon...
6/14/2006 3:25 PM | Jason Haley

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

I couldn't agree more with Jim, Karthik and Haacked. You do the filtering for a lot of us out there and even though we might not always link back to you we do greatly appreciate your efforts. In fact, you're listed in my blogroll...so there. :) Keep up the good work!
6/14/2006 3:34 PM | tod hilton

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

Tod: Thanks! I like the name of your domain :)
6/14/2006 3:50 PM | Jason Haley

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

i gave you a bit of a kick yesterday on this to see what you thought... and wow you're certainly listening! glad that so many people commented too because now i know "oh good, lots of other people read this daily list too!"

i'll keep reading as long as the links are interesting -- as i've said before this is one of the only blogs i read daily.

6/14/2006 4:19 PM | lb

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

Thanks lb! I always enjoy hearing from readers, I'll try to keep the links interesting.
6/14/2006 4:32 PM | Jason Haley

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

I like having a few great linkblogs in my OPML. It lets me get more info from less feeds, which saves me time.

Thanks Jason!
6/15/2006 9:16 AM | John Meyer

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

Thanks John!
6/15/2006 11:34 AM | Jason Haley

# re: Links as valuable blog content?

Because when I have my head buried in the weeds and can't even come up for a quick round of Halo, let alone the 300-odd feeds I read...I can count on you.

I can count on you because I've known you (in the intarweb sense) long enough that I trust your links to be a representation of things that I may want to look further into.

Further, I think there are some blogs out there that deserve being linked to. I've found some good ones through your site that I otherwise never would have found. That's the trump that links hold over comments, and that's a significant value in and of itself.

Clearly I'm like 2 weeks late on this by the way. I'm catching up on the last couple of weeks of .net news by way of Interesting Finds, so thanks again my brother in blogging.
6/25/2006 8:04 PM | Scott C Reynolds

# New and Notable 101

Not much today. WCF/SOA/WSE The WCF RSS Toolkit is a Windows Communication Foundation-based framework
9/24/2007 11:42 PM | Sam Gentile

Post Comment

Title  
Name  
Url
Comment   
Please enter the following code into the box below to stop spammers

  
Enter Code Here *